After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Search found 2 matches

by Underground
2014-02-14 17:22
Forum: Olders
Topic: MSMQ
Replies: 2
Views: 15807

Re: MSMQ

Yes. A port conflict was the other main thing I was looking at.

I haven't specifically seen anything yet, but I haven't had a lot of time to look at it.

Thanks!
by Underground
2014-02-07 15:09
Forum: Olders
Topic: MSMQ
Replies: 2
Views: 15807

MSMQ

Is there anything in this version that might affect another application on the same server utilizing MSMQ?

Essentially we shut down UltraVNC service and broke the other application, started it back up and it started working again. Don't see any direct references, but it makes extensive use of ...