Hi. I'm currently giving a try to the SC Ultra VNC. For my needs it misses or appears to miss a readonly option. Already tried the
-connect 1xx.x.x.xx:5500 -noregistry -readonly
on the host parameters without any positive result.
The SC documentation says that there's support for the -readonly option, but has no other specs about that.
Am I doing anything wrong?
Thanks in advance for any answer. Greetings from Chile,
José Ignacio Santa Cruz
jsantacruz in gmail point com
Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
SC in readonly mode
have same issue
SC 1.0.0
-connect 192.168.1.101 -readonly -noregistry
or
-connect 192.168.1.101 -noregistry -readonly
no effect, ignored ?
SC 1.0.0
-connect 192.168.1.101 -readonly -noregistry
or
-connect 192.168.1.101 -noregistry -readonly
no effect, ignored ?
Last edited by redge on 2005-08-28 16:02, edited 1 time in total.
UltraVNC 1.0.9.6.1 (built 20110518)
OS Win: xp home + vista business + 7 home
only experienced user, not developer
OS Win: xp home + vista business + 7 home
only experienced user, not developer