Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: viewtopic.php?t=37864

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Compiler entries

Simple, Free, Open Source UltraVNC Wrapper Supporting Windows and Mac OSX
Post Reply
mudshark
20
20
Posts: 36
Joined: 2007-09-15 23:55

Compiler entries

Post by mudshark »

Had some trouble with my UVNC SC setup... It just stopped working one day.
Verified everything set same as it was. No help. Deleted all UVNC and updated to newest ver. Even rebuilt the remote client and still cannot get it to work. Works on-LAN via IP but not using my static IP from outside my LAN.

Decided a repeater was the way to go so I am now trying to setup ChunkVNC!

I cannot get this to work either...
I guess the same issue that haunted me with plain UVNC may still be a factor?

The repeater is running (from step 1).
I compile (in step 2).
In step 3, part 1 we run InstantSupport.exe on a customers computer where they are greeted with an ID number. However on my PC where the repeater is running the repeater log window never ACKs any attempt at connection.

I am instructed that this problem is either with port forwarding or your WAN address.
Ports 5500 & 5901 are forwarding to ports 5500 & 5901 at the PC's IP.

The only other thing that happens is on the PC REQing remote assistance a UVNC server property page opens. I cannot change the VNC password to match what I put in the compiler, it is grayed out. Also there is a DSM plug-in checked that I know nothing about.

Am at a complete loss. Any ideas?
RichieG
User avatar
supercoe
400
400
Posts: 1732
Joined: 2009-07-20 21:27
Location: Walker, MN
Contact:

Re: Compiler entries

Post by supercoe »

With the repeater running check that ports 5500 and 5901 are open with http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/open-ports/

The property page generally comes up if VNC_HASH failed. ChunkVNC 3.2 requires Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package for the password hashing executable.

Or wait one more day, I'm packaging up 3.3 as we speak which will offer some built in port testing. :)
http://www.chunkvnc.com - ChunkVNC - Free PC Remote control with the Open Source UltraVNC wrapper InstantSupport!
B
800
800
Posts: 2338
Joined: 2009-09-09 14:05

Re: Compiler entries

Post by B »

Be sure the client side is addressing the repeater by its WAN address; it sounds as if it may be using the local address? On the remote machine check the contents of ChunkViewer.ini.
User avatar
supercoe
400
400
Posts: 1732
Joined: 2009-07-20 21:27
Location: Walker, MN
Contact:

Re: Compiler entries

Post by supercoe »

ChunkVNC 3.3 doesn't require the C++ redist and also checks for the existence of the repeater.
It would be preferred that the user retest with that version. :)
http://www.chunkvnc.com - ChunkVNC - Free PC Remote control with the Open Source UltraVNC wrapper InstantSupport!
mudshark
20
20
Posts: 36
Joined: 2007-09-15 23:55

Re: Compiler entries

Post by mudshark »

Hummm OK, Looking for ver 3.3 but more importantly my ports 5500 & 5901 shows as closed at that tool you pointed me to.
Port 5900 shows as open! My web security & firewall is turned off for this test and in the router all 3 forwards are identical (ie 5900>5900, 5500>5500, & 5901>5901).
Perplexing!!
RichieG
B
800
800
Posts: 2338
Joined: 2009-09-09 14:05

Re: Compiler entries

Post by B »

At your repeater PC I would open up a command line and run

netstat -an | find/i "5500"

and

netstat -an | find/i "5901"


in order to see whether the machine has the repeater ports open at all. (But if you're already able to attach to the repeater locally from another machine on the LAN then you don't need to bother.)
Post Reply