Update: UltraVNC 1.4.3.6 and UltraVNC SC 1.4.3.6: viewtopic.php?t=37885
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: viewtopic.php?t=37864
Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
repeater 2011
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
This have to be something in the web interface...
What port are you using for it ?
What's the memory usage after a week ?
What port are you using for it ?
What's the memory usage after a week ?
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
I use default 80 port.Rudi De Vos wrote:This have to be something in the web interface...
What port are you using for it ?
What's the memory usage after a week ?
Memory is low - about 4 -6 Mb.
Only CPU usage is high (60-80%).
I think, it depends from one moment. When connection is broken between repeater and server, but socket is not free and it will begun to grown and to leak.
www.artanna.org - Anna Poluboyarinova
Art of Russia
Art of Russia
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
testing on port 8080 (open to public) i got a web loop, using all availbe cpu.
The webinterface is the cause...
Now it need to wait until it happen again to see insite the loop.
The webinterface is the cause...
Now it need to wait until it happen again to see insite the loop.
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
well. I will reconfigure my servers and viewers tomorrow and we will see how it happend, i hope. Is your repeater allow to connect outside servers and viewers?Rudi De Vos wrote:testing on port 8080 (open to public) i got a web loop, using all availbe cpu.
The webinterface is the cause...
Now it need to wait until it happen again to see insite the loop.
www.artanna.org - Anna Poluboyarinova
Art of Russia
Art of Russia
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
It's running on port 8080 on support1.uvnc.com, port is open to the public.
The log show that no viewer/server connection was ever made, the webserver was looping. Seems to me it fail to detect some broken web
session and continous try to send data.
The log show that no viewer/server connection was ever made, the webserver was looping. Seems to me it fail to detect some broken web
session and continous try to send data.
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
Hey Rudi,
excellent work. We're actually testing it.
How did you implement the webserver/service? By yourself or did you use prefabricated components?
excellent work. We're actually testing it.
How did you implement the webserver/service? By yourself or did you use prefabricated components?
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
Very strange. I can't to connect my viewer to your server.Rudi De Vos wrote:It's running on port 8080 on support1.uvnc.com, port is open to the public.
The log show that no viewer/server connection was ever made, the webserver was looping. Seems to me it fail to detect some broken web
session and continous try to send data.
I take message:
Connection failed - End of Stream.
I did samething wrong, didn't it?
www.artanna.org - Anna Poluboyarinova
Art of Russia
Art of Russia
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
webio (codeproject )was used as embedded server
but it doesn't seems to be 100% error free.
no connection: correct
comment method active, and no comment set.
Found error, testing changes
but it doesn't seems to be 100% error free.
no connection: correct
comment method active, and no comment set.
Found error, testing changes
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
We have randomly the problem that a connection is shown as established on repeaters WebGUI, but the viewer shows only "negotiating protocol version..." and nothing happens. I think it's more often, when first the server is connected and then the viewer connects to repeater.
I remember that a similar problem existed in a earlier version. possibly related? info: we use the rc4 dsmplugin.
I remember that a similar problem existed in a earlier version. possibly related? info: we use the rc4 dsmplugin.
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
FOUND THE BUG,
easy to reproduce:
1. Connect one viewer/server pair with each other and let them connected.
2. start another server first
3. then start the viewer.
WebGUI shows the last pair connected too, but no screen is shown. Viewer hangs at "Negotiate Protocol Version ..." after the timeout the viewer shows "Error reading protocol Version".
If the viewer of the second pair connects first to repeater and then the server connects, the second pair works fine.
Hint: we use the rc4-dsmplugin.
Fast bugfix would be nice. We love the WebGUI, want to keep it and don't want to make a rollback to V1.
easy to reproduce:
1. Connect one viewer/server pair with each other and let them connected.
2. start another server first
3. then start the viewer.
WebGUI shows the last pair connected too, but no screen is shown. Viewer hangs at "Negotiate Protocol Version ..." after the timeout the viewer shows "Error reading protocol Version".
If the viewer of the second pair connects first to repeater and then the server connects, the second pair works fine.
Hint: we use the rc4-dsmplugin.
Fast bugfix would be nice. We love the WebGUI, want to keep it and don't want to make a rollback to V1.
Last edited by Prisma on 2011-03-31 10:00, edited 1 time in total.
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
Please check, reuploaded repeater.
Should be fixed.
Tested:
connect server
connect viwewer
connection
connect server
connecet viewer
connection
using a dsm plugin.
http://www.uvnc.com:8080
donwload -> repeater
Should be fixed.
Tested:
connect server
connect viwewer
connection
connect server
connecet viewer
connection
using a dsm plugin.
http://www.uvnc.com:8080
donwload -> repeater
Last edited by Rudi De Vos on 2011-04-04 12:22, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Beta repeater v2.0
bugfix confirmed.
Good work, thanx a lot!
Good work, thanx a lot!
Re: repeater 2011
Hello Rudi,
all of our customers have a unique ID. We're processing the comment.txt automatically from our customer database to identify the incoming IDs. Actually we have to limit the select @499 lines. Is this really the limit? It would be nice if it would be possible to get more comments than 499. At the moment we can only identify a part of our customers.
Only then it would also possible to activate the connection protection through the comment file. For us the protection is less important, but I can imagine for others this would be more interesting.
Cheers Greg
all of our customers have a unique ID. We're processing the comment.txt automatically from our customer database to identify the incoming IDs. Actually we have to limit the select @499 lines. Is this really the limit? It would be nice if it would be possible to get more comments than 499. At the moment we can only identify a part of our customers.
Only then it would also possible to activate the connection protection through the comment file. For us the protection is less important, but I can imagine for others this would be more interesting.
Cheers Greg
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: repeater 2011
MAX_LIST=250 ( max waiting connections)
comments= MAX_LIST x 2
Change MAX_LIST to higher number and recompile.
-Webgui "change comment" will not work. GET doesn't allow to send
a huge string.
comments= MAX_LIST x 2
Change MAX_LIST to higher number and recompile.
-Webgui "change comment" will not work. GET doesn't allow to send
a huge string.
Re: repeater 2011
So a restart of repeater will be necessary if comment.txt is re-written? That wouldn't be a huge problem for us.
But why don't you switch to POST instead of GET? There shouldn't be no string limitation, should it?
But why don't you switch to POST instead of GET? There shouldn't be no string limitation, should it?
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: repeater 2011
After manual editing the comment file, you need to press the reload button
, this is only limited by the MAX setting.
Add/del will still work, only the multi-change fail if string is to long.
Webio lib, doesn't have the POST buildin.
This is a simple web gui server...
The requirement for more then 500+ comments is limited, and in that case
it also a lot faster to use some text editor to make the changes offline and
reload the file.
, this is only limited by the MAX setting.
Add/del will still work, only the multi-change fail if string is to long.
Webio lib, doesn't have the POST buildin.
This is a simple web gui server...
The requirement for more then 500+ comments is limited, and in that case
it also a lot faster to use some text editor to make the changes offline and
reload the file.
Last edited by Rudi De Vos on 2011-04-05 10:02, edited 1 time in total.
Re: repeater 2011
I'm a little bit confused...
We can process a comment.txt (what means "manual" editing) press reload, everything is fine? In this case nothing has to be send via GET, right? But edititing with WebGUI more than 500 comments would be a problem, what we don't want to do, right?
We can process a comment.txt (what means "manual" editing) press reload, everything is fine? In this case nothing has to be send via GET, right? But edititing with WebGUI more than 500 comments would be a problem, what we don't want to do, right?
- Rudi De Vos
- Admin & Developer
- Posts: 6832
- Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
- Contact:
Re: repeater 2011
We can process a comment.txt (what means "manual" editing) press reload, everything is fine? Yes
You can still press
[reload]
[add]
[delete]
It only send a single comment line via GET.
Only the function the modify multiple lines at once send all comment lines via GET. This is to big...
My point is that when you need to edit 100 records it's just simpler to use some standard file editor with copy/paste or auto create the file from
some database.
Edit/upload/ press [reload]
You should test it...
change MAX_LIST=1000 in the source and recompile.
The you can have 1000 servers/viewers waiting and 2000 comment
available.
You can still press
[reload]
[add]
[delete]
It only send a single comment line via GET.
Only the function the modify multiple lines at once send all comment lines via GET. This is to big...
My point is that when you need to edit 100 records it's just simpler to use some standard file editor with copy/paste or auto create the file from
some database.
Edit/upload/ press [reload]
You should test it...
change MAX_LIST=1000 in the source and recompile.
The you can have 1000 servers/viewers waiting and 2000 comment
available.
Re: repeater 2011
There seems to be a bug with DNS resolving.
When using the repeater to connect to a client named "PC-Test1", the repeater seems to resolve "PC" and therefore will never get the correct client IP.
Best Regards
tomha
When using the repeater to connect to a client named "PC-Test1", the repeater seems to resolve "PC" and therefore will never get the correct client IP.
Best Regards
tomha
Repeater 2011 - Server/viewer ports
I'm little bit confused about ports marking in web GUI. Why "Server port" in Settings screen = "Listen Port Viewer" in Stats screen? Is it an mistake or am I missing some idea behind?
Rem. Sorry, this question belongs to Repeater 2011 thread... Admin, can you move it, please?
[ Moved per request ]
Rem. Sorry, this question belongs to Repeater 2011 thread... Admin, can you move it, please?
[ Moved per request ]
Last edited by KoMiKo on 2011-04-11 15:57, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Repeater 2011 - Server/viewer ports
I'd say it's a bug. Haven't noticed that also. Stats screen is wrong.
Re: Repeater 2011 - Server/viewer ports
No, Stats screen is correct. Settings screen is wrong.Prisma wrote:I'd say it's a bug. Haven't noticed that also. Stats screen is wrong.
Last edited by KoMiKo on 2011-04-11 16:18, edited 1 time in total.
Re: repeater 2011
The main EditControl window doesn't display any text at all, is this a known issue?
Re: repeater 2011
Uuups, I was waiting for a recompiled version. Haven't seen, that you wrote: Do it yourself... Would you be so kind to recompile the repeater? I'm also not able to checkout uvnc. I'm gettingRudi De Vos wrote: You should test it...
change MAX_LIST=1000 in the source and recompile.
The you can have 1000 servers/viewers waiting and 2000 comment
available.
Code: Select all
ERROR | OPTIONS of »http://ultravnc.svn.sourceforge.net«: 200 OK (http://ultravnc.svn.sourceforge.net)
Crashes ON first Connect.
I have tried Repeater 2011 and 2010, and before this I was using version 1.00
BTW with 1.0, it worked well, but was extremely slow with the newer versions of VNC, and the newer Windows Versions, We need to upgrade to a newer version.
My setup is below. I just access a Server on the 192.168.4.xxx Network and I get this.
![Image](http://www.sylect.us/VNCError.png)
My setup.
Computers Accessing:
192.168.1.0-192.168.1.255
Using version 1.0.9.6
using { proxyhost=192.168.2.xxx }
{ proxyport=6001 }
From inside the .vnc file.
{VPN to Colo Facility}
Computer with Repeater:
192.168.2.xxx
Server Port:6001
Using only Mode I
{VPN to a 3rd Facility}
192.168.4.xxx
using VNC Version
1.0.5.0 - 1.0.9.6
BTW with 1.0, it worked well, but was extremely slow with the newer versions of VNC, and the newer Windows Versions, We need to upgrade to a newer version.
My setup is below. I just access a Server on the 192.168.4.xxx Network and I get this.
![Image](http://www.sylect.us/VNCError.png)
My setup.
Computers Accessing:
192.168.1.0-192.168.1.255
Using version 1.0.9.6
using { proxyhost=192.168.2.xxx }
{ proxyport=6001 }
From inside the .vnc file.
{VPN to Colo Facility}
Computer with Repeater:
192.168.2.xxx
Server Port:6001
Using only Mode I
{VPN to a 3rd Facility}
192.168.4.xxx
using VNC Version
1.0.5.0 - 1.0.9.6
Last edited by smcmanus on 2011-05-05 19:24, edited 1 time in total.
Amigas will rule the world.
Re: repeater 2011
Hi, how can I install distributer as a service ?
Re: repeater 2011
I answer myself:
I've been using the program "Non-Sucking Service Manager" and everything works ok.
Thanks
I've been using the program "Non-Sucking Service Manager" and everything works ok.
Thanks
Re: repeater 2011
There is a simple way without need to use external program. Just type command:arkady25 wrote:Hi, how can I install distributer as a service ?
"distributer.exe -install" (without quotes) to install service
"distributer.exe -uninstall" to uninstall it.
Enjoy
Re: repeater 2011
Sorry , we use repeater mode II with dsmplugin and it works nearly perfect (except of some mysterious crashes). I have no experiences with mode I, I'm not able to help you...smcmanus wrote:Does no one have Any idea about my problem?