After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly changed SCHook.dll

Single Click discussions / bugs
Post Reply
lwc
40
40
Posts: 98
Joined: 2006-08-08 11:00

UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly changed SCHook.dll

Post by lwc »

It seems the online creator UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly replaced SCHook.dll from v1.0.0.1 to 1.0.0.2.

Was it ever officially announced? It's funny that a 2011 package contains 2012 materials.
Top
User avatar
Rudi De Vos
Admin & Developer
Admin & Developer
Posts: 6952
Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
Contact:
Contact Rudi De Vos

Re: UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly changed SCHook.dll

Post by Rudi De Vos »

If bugs are found i also update the online compiler.
schook is the same for winvnc full and sc.
schook was missing some hints ( schook give hints about the changed screen locations)
UltraVNC links (join us on social networks):
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- Forum: https://forum.uvnc.com/
- GitHub sourcecode: https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
- uvnc2me: https://uvnc2me.com/
Top
lwc
40
40
Posts: 98
Joined: 2006-08-08 11:00

Re: UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly changed SCHook.dll

Post by lwc »

Not exactly. SCHook.dll from the regular uVNC is 65,784 bytes, while the SC version is 72,440 bytes.
Why is that?

In any case, if v1.0.0.2 fixes bugs, it should have been announced. Otherwise most SC admins out there wouldn't know they can upgrade their SC packages.
Top
User avatar
Rudi De Vos
Admin & Developer
Admin & Developer
Posts: 6952
Joined: 2004-04-23 10:21
Contact:
Contact Rudi De Vos

Re: UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly changed SCHook.dll

Post by Rudi De Vos »

Then i need to check.
SC is a seperate source tree build on a old XP with VC6.0 ( very old compiler).
It could be that i needed to make changes on the schook source to make it build on VC6.0.

Anyway, all SChook versions are compatible you can always use another version.
UltraVNC links (join us on social networks):
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- Forum: https://forum.uvnc.com/
- GitHub sourcecode: https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc
- uvnc2me: https://uvnc2me.com/
Top
lwc
40
40
Posts: 98
Joined: 2006-08-08 11:00

Re: UltraVncSC update 2011 suddenly changed SCHook.dll

Post by lwc »

Thanks for the fix (it's now called "Update 2013")!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “SC”