RTechTool-A ChunkVNC Mod

[tbote]

Ah, so <b>this</b> is the "other fork" supercoe was talking about!

I missed it entirely because I was sticking to the ChunkVNC subforum here.

Nice move on the Google Code and subversion hosting, supercoe. I love your attitude and enthusiasm on the project. Hope you're having a good vacation.

I started this because ChunkVNC was a great find but I need some changes to do it more useful for me. Since that I've make more changes but really I have no experience in SVN and now don't have time to learn it so I've don't publish new releases

[supercoe]

tbote,

Don't worry about the SVN, guinness and I have that covered. Please keep posting your work, I'll credit you with any code I use from this project.

[tbote]

tbote,

Don't worry about the SVN, guinness and I have that covered. Please keep posting your work, I'll credit you with any code I use from this project.

I've wrote a lot of new code but really we are very limited with the actual repeater. The client side is basically the same but my viewer has more options like name, time, duration, comments and thinks like that.

Regards

[guinness]

I would like to see your included features

[Zyxyx]

Yes, me too... sounds great.

tbote, why don't you join the ChunkVNC development team at : http://chunkvnc.googlecode.com ?

I guess you could easily upload the code changes you made so they (involved developers) could have a look and maybe use some of your work.

And if you wanted to, you could most probably help this project to evolve faster.

Zyxyx

[tbote]

I don't think that RTechTool or ChunkVNC can do much more things without a new repeater, all features that I've added are just for better control in the server side (basically a log, assign names to connections, etc), but the client is very very limited. For me the tools is working ok, I use it a lot of times every day, but really don't figure how can I improve the tool with this repeater.

Sincerily I'm looking other tools now because UltraVNC+Repeater are very, very slow if you compare it with LogmeIn (and also it works with firewalls), I dream with a tools like that but freeware and full control (activex server using 80 port+repeater+viewer)...

[supercoe]

tbote,

Which is what I'm in the process of doing. I call it ChunkServer and it will allow me to pass much more information between InstantSupport and the Viewer. Hopefully in the future the code can be merged with the repeater itself but currently it's a separate executable.

[tbote]

tbote,

Which is what I'm in the process of doing. I call it ChunkServer and it will allow me to pass much more information between InstantSupport and the Viewer. Hopefully in the future the code can be merged with the repeater itself but currently it's a separate executable.

I thought about that, it's a way to add features but also another exefile (really two exes, host&client), more weight... that's not sound a good idea for me, anyway I'll take a look to ChunkServer when you release it, may be this give me a new way to explore.

Regards

[B]

Also, take a look at shadowfax's idea at [topic=17940][/topic]

He or she is talking about redirecting and repositioning repeater connections to act like regular VNC target sessions. It's a great idea.

[supercoe]

tbote,

Only one executable would be added, InstantSupport and ChunkViewer will have the ability to communicate directly to ChunkServer.

I agree with you about executable bloat but I currently don't have the skills to merge what I want to do into the repeater. Hopefully some day!


B,

I really like shadowfax's idea of a repeater that gives the viewer a session in which it can choose an ID but it sounds like a ton of work...

[B]

It would probably end up turning into a full bore proxy, rendering the screens and serving them, rather than the pass-through repeater it is now.