After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

Qt4 Port

Any features you would like to see in UltraVNC? Propose it here
Post Reply
djtm
8
8
Posts: 8
Joined: 2007-12-12 04:06

Qt4 Port

Post by djtm »

Hi,

I saw that you use Borland C++ as the programming environment at the moment.

Qt has a much better portability and would not only Linux users use ultravnc, but also Mac OS X users and of course it would work in Windows as well. And it should be *much* easier to port to embedded systems as well.

From my experience the qt api is mostly quite straight forward.
And it would enable developers from other platforms to join the programming work.

IMHO Ultravnc is currently the best VNC software. The only thing it really lacks is cross-platform compatibility.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Feature requests”