After more 2 000 000 (two million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.1.0, 1.6.3.0-dev versions
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.4.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.4.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38095
Feedback is always welcome

2026-04-01: After 1.7.x, 1.8.x release builds need tests and feedback: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38158

2026-03-11: CVE-2026-3787 and CVE-2026-4962 - Clarification: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38155

2025-12-02: We need help: English Wikipedia UltraVNC page has been requested to deletion: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38127
Any help is welcome to improve the UltraVNC page and/or to comment on the Wikipedia Talk page

2025-05-06: Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

2023-09-21: Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome
Feedback is welcome

Help is very needed for:
Windows ARM/ARM64 support: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38163 / https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC/issues/346
macOS support: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38164 / https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC/issues/347
Linux support: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38165 / https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC/issues/348
*BSD support: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38166 / https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC/issues/349
*Solaris support: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38167 / https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC/issues/350

Raise the number of concurren connections to the repeater

Any features you would like to see in UltraVNC? Propose it here
Post Reply
swinster
20
20
Posts: 32
Joined: 2007-04-13 10:52

Raise the number of concurren connections to the repeater

Post by swinster »

Hi,

I read somewhere in the FAQ that the maximum number of connection that can be handled by the repeater is 20 ([topic=3173][/topic])? If this is true then it would be a good idea to raise this figure significatly. I'm not sure how much network traffic is utilised for each server that inversely connects to a repeater, but if is just simply a wait connection then surely it could cope with many open connections.

I will probably want to remote manage around 100 computers that will inversely connect to a repeater.
Last edited by swinster on 2008-08-25 13:46, edited 3 times in total.
Chris
Post Reply