After more 1 000 000 (one million) views on forum for 1.5.0.x development versions... and 1.6.0.0 version
A new stable version, UltraVNC 1.6.1.0 and UltraVNC SC 1.6.1.0 have been released: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38080
Feedback is welcome

Celebrating the 22th anniversary of the UltraVNC (25th anniversary since the laying of the foundation stone): https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38031

Important: Please update to latest version before to create a reply, a topic or an issue: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=37864

Forum password change request: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38078

Development: UltraVNC development is always here... Any help is welcome.
A new development version, UltraVNC 1.6.3.0-dev has been released, please test it: https://forum.uvnc.com/viewtopic.php?t=38091
Feedback is welcome

Join us on social networks and share our announcements:
- Website: https://uvnc.com/
- GitHub: https://github.com/ultravnc
- Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@ultravnc
- Bluesky/AT Protocol: https://bsky.app/profile/ultravnc.bsky.social
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ultravnc1
- X/Twitter: https://x.com/ultravnc1
- Reddit community: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultravnc
- OpenHub: https://openhub.net/p/ultravnc

1.0.8.2 screen refresh so slow on XP

Post Reply
DKY
8
8
Posts: 20
Joined: 2005-04-03 12:13

1.0.8.2 screen refresh so slow on XP

Post by DKY »

I've installed previous versions of ultravnc with my XP machine and I used to have to download and install the video hook driver to make my screen react much more quickly to clicks and drags but I've recently downloaded the lastest stable version and installed it on my XP machine and noticed that it installs the hook driver automatically. I went to properties and check marked the box to enable it and it seems to be working and active but my screen still takes anywhere from 5 to 10 seconds sometimes to show a screen change. I'm using ultra vnc over a lan so it's not an internet issue. Does anyone have any thoughts? Is there an additional step that I'm missing to get this to run more efficiently? Thanks in advance!
Post Reply